Hepatic clearance of erythromycin (Ery) is significantly reduced in patients with end stage renal disease. Since Ery is primarily eliminated via excretion of unchanged drug in the bile, we suspect that this change could be due to the effect of uremic toxins on hepatic uptake and/or efflux transporters. Using rat hepatocytes and microsomes as model proof of concept systems, we examined six uremic toxins, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furan-propanoic acid (CMPF), indoxyl sulfate (IS), hippuric acid (HA), indole acetic acid (IA), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA), and indoxyl-beta-D-glucuronide (IG), for their effects on Ery uptake and metabolism. Ery and the metabolite N-demethyl-Ery were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The uptake of Ery by rat hepatocytes was markedly inhibited by rifampin and digoxin, but not by quinidine, suggesting that Oatp2 plays a major role in the uptake of Ery. At 50 microM, CMPF significantly (p < 0.05) reduced hepatocyte accumulation of Ery and N-demethyl-Ery. At higher concentrations (>200 microM), CMPF appears to also inhibit the enzymatic metabolism of Ery. In contrast, IS did not significantly inhibit the hepatocyte uptake of Ery, even at the highest concentration (800 microM) tested, but reduced metabolite generation (p < 0.001). The other uremic toxins, HA, IA, IG, and GSA, did not affect either hepatic uptake or microsomal metabolism of Ery. CMPF, IS, and HA were shown not to inhibit differential P-glycoprotein transport of Ery in cellular systems. Our results suggest that CMPF can directly inhibit the uptake of Ery by inhibiting Oatp2, whereas IS is more likely to inhibit the enzymatic metabolism of Ery.

In 2003 citizens of Canada, the United Kingdom, and France paid an average of 34-59 percent of what Americans paid for a similar market basket of pharmaceuticals. If the Medicare program were to pay comparable prices for pharmaceuticals, it would be possible to eliminate the "doughnut hole" in its prescription drug benefit and keep Medicare drug spending within the overall limits established by Congress. This provides Congress with a clear choice: reduce the level of cost sharing and improve beneficiaries' access to pharmaceuticals, or allow the pharmaceutical industry to use the higher prices to fund research and development and to engage in other activities.

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) are controversial. We conducted a critical review of the literature in BE to provide guidance on clinically relevant issues.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 18 participants evaluated the strength and the grade of evidence for 42 statements pertaining to the diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and treatment of BE. Each member anonymously voted to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion.

RESULTS

There was strong consensus on most statements for acceptance or rejection. Members rejected statements that screening for BE has been shown to improve mortality from adenocarcinoma or to be cost-effective. Contrary to published clinical guidelines, they did not feel that screening should be recommended for adults over age 50, regardless of age or duration of heartburn. Members were divided on whether surveillance prolongs survival, although the majority agreed that it detects curable neoplasia and can be cost-effective in selected patients. The majority did not feel that acid-reduction therapy reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but did agree that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with a cancer risk reduction and are of promising (but unproven) value. Participants rejected the notion that mucosal ablation with acid suppression prevents adenocarcinoma in BE but agreed that this may be an appropriate strategy in a subgroup of patients with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.