Publications

Hepatic clearance of erythromycin (Ery) is significantly reduced in patients with end stage renal disease. Since Ery is primarily eliminated via excretion of unchanged drug in the bile, we suspect that this change could be due to the effect of uremic toxins on hepatic uptake and/or efflux transporters. Using rat hepatocytes and microsomes as model proof of concept systems, we examined six uremic toxins, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furan-propanoic acid (CMPF), indoxyl sulfate (IS), hippuric acid (HA), indole acetic acid (IA), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA), and indoxyl-beta-D-glucuronide (IG), for their effects on Ery uptake and metabolism. Ery and the metabolite N-demethyl-Ery were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The uptake of Ery by rat hepatocytes was markedly inhibited by rifampin and digoxin, but not by quinidine, suggesting that Oatp2 plays a major role in the uptake of Ery. At 50 microM, CMPF significantly (p < 0.05) reduced hepatocyte accumulation of Ery and N-demethyl-Ery. At higher concentrations (>200 microM), CMPF appears to also inhibit the enzymatic metabolism of Ery. In contrast, IS did not significantly inhibit the hepatocyte uptake of Ery, even at the highest concentration (800 microM) tested, but reduced metabolite generation (p < 0.001). The other uremic toxins, HA, IA, IG, and GSA, did not affect either hepatic uptake or microsomal metabolism of Ery. CMPF, IS, and HA were shown not to inhibit differential P-glycoprotein transport of Ery in cellular systems. Our results suggest that CMPF can directly inhibit the uptake of Ery by inhibiting Oatp2, whereas IS is more likely to inhibit the enzymatic metabolism of Ery.

In 2003 citizens of Canada, the United Kingdom, and France paid an average of 34-59 percent of what Americans paid for a similar market basket of pharmaceuticals. If the Medicare program were to pay comparable prices for pharmaceuticals, it would be possible to eliminate the "doughnut hole" in its prescription drug benefit and keep Medicare drug spending within the overall limits established by Congress. This provides Congress with a clear choice: reduce the level of cost sharing and improve beneficiaries' access to pharmaceuticals, or allow the pharmaceutical industry to use the higher prices to fund research and development and to engage in other activities.

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) are controversial. We conducted a critical review of the literature in BE to provide guidance on clinically relevant issues.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 18 participants evaluated the strength and the grade of evidence for 42 statements pertaining to the diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and treatment of BE. Each member anonymously voted to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion.

RESULTS

There was strong consensus on most statements for acceptance or rejection. Members rejected statements that screening for BE has been shown to improve mortality from adenocarcinoma or to be cost-effective. Contrary to published clinical guidelines, they did not feel that screening should be recommended for adults over age 50, regardless of age or duration of heartburn. Members were divided on whether surveillance prolongs survival, although the majority agreed that it detects curable neoplasia and can be cost-effective in selected patients. The majority did not feel that acid-reduction therapy reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but did agree that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with a cancer risk reduction and are of promising (but unproven) value. Participants rejected the notion that mucosal ablation with acid suppression prevents adenocarcinoma in BE but agreed that this may be an appropriate strategy in a subgroup of patients with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether clinically relevant airspace concentrations of beta2-adrenergic agonists stimulated maximal alveolar fluid clearance rates and to determine whether beta2 agonist therapy decreased pulmonary edema in experimental acute lung injury.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized laboratory investigation.

SETTING

University-affiliated laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Sprague Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), salmeterol, albuterol, and isoproterenol in normal rat lung. Salmeterol in a rat model of acid-induced lung injury.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Basal alveolar fluid clearance was 7.6 +/- 2.2 %/hr. Maximal cAMP-dependent alveolar fluid clearance rate was 32.9 +/- 10.9 %/hr (p <.05). Racemic albuterol 10(-5) M, salmeterol 10(-6) M, and isoproterenol 10(-6) M each stimulated alveolar fluid clearance to a level comparable to maximal cAMP-dependent alveolar fluid clearance. Compared with basal rates, alveolar fluid clearance was increased by both racemic albuterol 10(-6) M (14.5 +/- 3.0%, p <.05) and R-enantiomer 10(-6) M (15.0 +/- 4.6%, p <.05), but there was no difference between the two groups. Intra-alveolar salmeterol 10 (-6) M attenuated the degree of pulmonary edema following acid-induced lung injury. Extravascular lung water increased to only 180 +/- 30 microL with salmeterol treatment, compared with 296 +/- 65 microL in saline-treated rats 4 hrs after acid injury (p <.05). This decrease in lung water was accompanied by a 2.4-fold increase in the rate of alveolar fluid clearance at 4 hrs in the salmeterol-treated group. Lung endothelial permeability, expressed as extravascular plasma equivalents, was reduced to 64 +/- 9 microL with salmeterol compared with 119 +/- 51 microL in saline-treated rats 4 hrs after acid injury (p <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically relevant airspace concentrations of beta2-adrenergic agonists a) stimulate maximal cAMP-dependent airspace fluid clearance in normal lungs and b) reduce pulmonary edema in acid aspiration-induced lung injury by increasing alveolar fluid clearance and decreasing endothelial permeability. Clinical studies are required to determine whether beta2-adrenergic agonists improve outcome in patients with acute lung injury.