We work hard to attract, retain, and support the most outstanding faculty.
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
OBJECTIVE
Although the use of oral cholecystographic agents (OCAs) had declined due to limited availability, there is literature to suggest it is an effective medication for thyrotoxicosis in appropriate clinical situations.
METHODS
The authors performed a PubMed search and systematically reviewed all the English written case reports, original studies and reviews from 1953 to 2012. Additional information was supplemented from available online pharmacologic databases.
RESULTS
The off-label use of OCAs was reviewed for the management of neonatal and adult Graves' disease, subacute thyroiditis, amiodarone-induced thyroiditis (AIT), exogenous hyperthyroidism, toxic multinodular goiter (TMNG), thyrotropinoma, thyrotoxicosis during pregnancy, rapid pre-operative control of hyperthyroidism, and thyroid storm. Adverse effects were also reviewed.
CONCLUSION
OCAs generally are effective agents in treating thyrotoxicosis in the etiologies reviewed. OCAs are clinically relevant in patients who require rapid control, such as in the pre-operative state or patient who cannot tolerate a thyrotoxicosis state. OCA may also be beneficial in situations where other anti-thyroidal medication would be hazardous or ineffective, such as thionamide allergy or exogenous thyrotoxicosis. Given concern for long-term relapse, OCAs should be considered a short-term bridge to definitive therapy. OCAs are limited in TMNG and should be second line after glucocorticoids in AIT II. OCAs do not preclude the use of radioactive iodine, which can be performed one week after OCA therapy.
View on PubMed2014
2014
OBJECTIVE
Using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is a nationally endorsed quality measure. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of receiving glucocorticoids alone for the treatment of RA in a nationwide sample of Medicare beneficiaries.
METHODS
Among individuals ages ≥65 years with RA enrolled in the Part D prescription drug benefit in 2009, we compared those with ≥1 DMARD claim to those receiving glucocorticoid monotherapy, defined as no DMARD claim and an annual glucocorticoid supply of ≥180 days or an annual dose of ≥900 mg of prednisone or equivalent. We fit multivariable models to determine the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with glucocorticoid monotherapy.
RESULTS
Of 8,125 beneficiaries treated for RA, 10.2% (n = 825) received glucocorticoids alone. Beneficiaries with low incomes were more likely to receive glucocorticoids alone (12.3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 10.9-13.8% versus 9.4%; 95% CI 8.6-10.1%), as were those living in certain US regions. More physician office visits and hospitalizations were associated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. Individuals who had no contact with a rheumatologist were significantly more likely to receive glucocorticoids alone (17.5%; 95% CI 16.0-19.0% versus 8.5%; 95% CI 7.4-9.5% for those with no rheumatology visits versus 1-4 visits).
CONCLUSION
Approximately 1 in 10 Medicare beneficiaries treated for RA received glucocorticoids without DMARDs in 2009. Compared to DMARD users, glucocorticoid users were older, had lower incomes, were more likely to live in certain US regions, and were less likely to have seen a rheumatologist, suggesting persistent gaps in quality of care despite expanded drug coverage under Part D.
View on PubMed2014