Occupational asthma (OA) can be defined as variable airways narrowing causally related to exposure in the working environment to airborne dusts, gases, vapours or fumes. There are many agents in the work-place that can induce asthma or cause substantial deterioration in pre-existing asthma. It has been estimated that 5-15% of adult-onset asthma can be attributed to occupational exposures. Hence adult patients, especially those with new-onset asthma, must be investigated with regard to occupational risk factors for disease. The prognosis for OA is improved if the causal exposure is controlled either by controlling the exposure at the workplace or by moving the patient out of the workplace.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the predictors of smoking and time until smoking cessation in a cohort of adults with asthma.

METHODS

Adults with asthma (n = 374) in northern California completed structured telephone interviews at baseline and 18-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 374 subjects, 156 reported ever having smoked, and 39 indicated that they currently smoked. Earlier birth cohort, lower educational attainment. White race, and presence in childhood residence of an adult who smoked were associated with a greater risk of ever smoking. Lower educational attainment, early smoking initiation, higher daily cigarette consumption, and late-childhood-onset asthma were associated with a longer interval until smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with asthma at high risk of cigarette smoking and delayed quitting can be identified on the basis of clinical and demographic characteristics.

BACKGROUND

The morbidity and mortality from asthma have markedly increased since the late 1970s. The hospitalization rate, an important marker of asthma severity, remains substantial.

METHODS

In adults with health care access, we prospectively studied 242 with asthma, aged 18-50 years, recruited from a random sample of allergy and pulmonary physician practices in Northern California to identify risk factors for subsequent hospitalization.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine subjects (16%) reported hospitalization for asthma during the 18-month follow-up period. On controlling for asthma severity in multiple logistic regression analysis, non-white race (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-8.8) and lower income (OR, 1.1 per $10,000 decrement; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3) were associated with a higher risk of asthma hospitalization. The severity-of-asthma score (OR, 3.4 per 5 points; 95%, CI 1.7-6.8) and recent asthma hospitalization (OR, 8.3; 95%, CI, 2.1-33.4) were also related to higher risk, after adjusting for demographic characteristics. Reliance on emergency department services for urgent asthma care was also associated with a greater likelihood of hospitalization (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.0-9.8). In multivariate analysis not controlling for asthma severity, low income was even more strongly related to hospitalization (OR, 1.2 per $10,000 decrement; 95% CI, 1.02-1.4).

CONCLUSION

In adult asthmatics with access to health care, non-white race, low income, and greater asthma severity were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization. Targeted interventions applied to high-risk asthma patients may reduce asthma morbidity and mortality.

Although inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use is associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization for asthma, the impact of ICS on the risk of life-threatening asthma exacerbation is less clear. The effect of ICS and inhaled beta agonist (IBA) dispensing on the risk of intensive care unit admission for asthma, a surrogate for life-threatening exacerbation, is evaluated. Using computerized International classification of diseases (ICD)-9 discharge diagnoses, a cohort of all 2,344 adult Northern California members of a health maintenance organization hospitalized for asthma over a 2-yr period were identified. Computerized pharmacy data was used to ascertain asthma medications dispensed during the 3-,6-, and 12-month intervals preceding index hospitalization for asthma. During the 3-months preceding hospitalization, a minority of subjects had no IBA units dispensed (34%), with 14% receiving low level (1 unit), 20% medium level (2-3 units), and 32% high level (> or = 4 units) therapy. A substantial proportion received no ICS units (55%), whereas 13% had low, 16% medium, and 15% high level therapy. In multiple logistic regression analysis, high level IBA use was associated with a greater risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for asthma after controlling for asthma severity. There was no relationship, however, between low or medium level IBA use and ICU admission. Conversely, medium level and high level ICS use were associated with a reduced risk of ICU admission. Analysing 6- and 12-month medication dispensing data, similar risk patterns were observed. Inhaled corticosteroid dispensing was associated with reduced risk of intensive care unit admission among adults hospitalized for asthma, whereas the opposite applied for high dose beta agonist usage. This suggests that ICS prescription to adults with moderate-to-severe asthma could reduce the risk of life-threatening exacerbation.

OBJECTIVE

Because they experience respiratory symptoms, adults with asthma might be expected to avoid cigarette smoking. However, previous studies have not adequately addressed whether adults with asthma have a lower prevalence of smoking than the general population. The authors sought to determine whether adult asthmatics are less likely to smoke cigarettes than members of the general population.

METHODS

The authors used data from a random sample of 2,902 California adults ages 18 years or older,with oversampling of African Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, adults with disabilities, and adults aged 45 to 70 years. Sampling weights were used in all analyses. In this cross-sectional study, 217 participants (7.5%) reported a physician diagnosis of asthma.

RESULTS

The prevalence of "ever smoking" was similar among adults with asthma (48.3%) and those without asthma (43.0%) (risk difference 5.3%; 95% CI -1.6%, 12.2%). There was also no difference in the prevalence of "current smoking" among adults with asthma (20.2%) compared with the non-asthmatic subjects (18.8%) (risk difference 1.4%; 95% CI -4.2%, 6.9%). After controlling for age, gender, race, and education, there was no evidence that adults with asthma were less likely to ever smoke. Although the confidence intervals did not exclude "no association," asthma was actually associated with an increased risk of ever smoking (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0, 1.8). There was also no association between asthma and the risk of current smoking after controlling for covariates (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.8, 1.6). Moreover, there were no differences in "age of smoking initiation," "duration of smoking," or "intensity of smoking" after adjusting for demographic characteristics. Redefining the referent group to exclude respondents with other chronic lung diseases did not appreciably change study conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Adults with asthma do not appear to selectively avoid cigarette smoking. Specific smoking prevention and cessation efforts should be targeted to adults with asthma.

Asthma and rhinitis are common chronic conditions that affect adults of working age. Little is known about their relative impacts on work loss and decreased productivity. Using random digit telephone dialing, we carried out a population-survey of adults in Northern California aged 18-50 years. We interviewed 125 persons with asthma (with or without concomitant rhinitis) and 175 persons with rhinitis alone. Study eligibility was based on subject report of a physician's diagnosis of asthma and/or a rhinitis-related condition. Any adult labor force participation since condition onset was lower among those with asthma (88%) than among those with rhinitis alone (97%) (P = 0.002). In contrast, among those still employed, decreased job effectiveness was more frequently reported in the rhinitis group (43 of 121; 36%) compared to those with asthma (14 of 72; 19%) (P = 0.02). Condition-attributed lost work was common in both groups, with more than 20% reporting one or more complete or partial work days lost in the 4 weeks previous to interview. Taking into account age, gender, race, and smoking status, those with asthma were more likely to have no labor force participation after diagnosis (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-7.7) and less likely to report decreased job effectiveness among those remaining employed (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Excluding subjects from the rhinitis group most likely to have unreported asthma based on past medication use had little impact on these associations. Both asthma and rhinitis negatively affect work productivity. Those with asthma are less likely to be employed at all, while among those remaining on the job, rhinitis is a more potent cause of decreased work effectiveness. The economic impact of asthma and rhinitis and related conditions may be under-appreciated.

Because the morbidity and mortality from adult asthma have been increasing, the identification of modifiable environmental exposures that exacerbate asthma has become a priority. Limited evidence suggests that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) may adversely affect adults with asthma. To study the effects of ETS better, we developed a survey instrument to measure ETS exposure in a cohort of adults with asthma living in northern California, where public indoor smoking is limited. To validate this survey instrument, we used a passive badge monitor that measures actual exposure to ambient nicotine, a direct and specific measure of ETS. In this validation study, we recruited 50 subjects from an ongoing longitudinal asthma cohort study who had a positive screening question for ETS exposure or potential exposure. Each subject wore a passive nicotine badge monitor for 7 days. After the personal monitoring period, we readministered the ETS exposure survey instrument. Based on the survey, self-reported total ETS exposure duration ranged from 0 to 70 hr during the previous 7 days. Based on the upper-range boundary, bars or nightclubs (55 hr) and the home (50 hr) were the sites associated with greatest maximal self-reported exposure. As measured by the personal nicotine badge monitors, the overall median 7-day nicotine concentration was 0.03 microg/m(3) (25th-75th interquartile range 0-3.69 microg/m(3)). Measured nicotine concentrations were highest among persons who reported home exposure (median 0.61 microg/m(3)), followed by work exposure (0.03 microg/m(3)), other (outdoor) exposure (0.025 microg/m(3)), and no exposure (0 microg/m(3); p = 0.03). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between self-reported ETS exposure duration and directly measured personal nicotine concentration during the same 7-day period was 0.47, supporting the survey's validity (p = 0.0006). Compared to persons with no measured exposure, lower-level [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-8.8] and higher-level ETS exposures (OR 6.8; 95% CI, 1.4-32.3) were associated with increased risk of respiratory symptoms. A brief, validated survey instrument can be used to assess ETS exposure among adults with asthma, even with low levels of exposure. This instrument could be a valuable tool for studying the effect of ETS exposure on adult asthma health outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Asthma and rhinosinusitis are common medical conditions among adults. Alternative treatments could have important impacts on health status among those individuals with these conditions, but specific prevalence data for these treatments are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of specific alternative treatment modalities, including herbal agents, ingestion of caffeinated beverages, homeopathy, acupuncture, and massage therapies.

DESIGN

Random population telephone sample.

SETTING

Northern California.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred adults aged 18 to 50 years with self-report of a physician diagnosis of asthma (n = 125) or rhinosinusitis without concomitant asthma (n = 175).

MEASUREMENTS

Structured telephone interviews covering demographics and clinical variables, including the following alternative treatments used in the previous 12 months: herbal agents; caffeine-containing products; homeopathy; acupuncture; aromatherapy; reflexology; and massage.

RESULTS

Any alternative practice was reported by 127 subjects (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 48%). Of these, 33 subjects (26%; 95% CI, 21 to 31%) were not current prescription medication users. Herbal use was reported by 72 subjects (24%), caffeine treatment by 54 subjects (18%), and other alternative treatments by 66 subjects (22%). Taking into account demographic variables, subjects with asthma were more likely than those with rhinitis alone to report caffeine self-treatment for their condition (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8%), but herbal use and other alternative treatments did not differ significantly by condition group.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatments are frequent among adults with asthma or rhinosinusitis and should be taken into account by health-care providers and public health and policy analysts.