Publications
We work hard to attract, retain, and support the most outstanding faculty.
2016
BACKGROUND
Internalization of HIV-related stigma may inhibit a person's ability to manage HIV disease through adherence to treatment regimens. Studies, mainly with white men, have suggested an association between internalized stigma and suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, there is a scarcity of research with women of different racial/ethnic backgrounds and on mediating mechanisms in the association between internalized stigma and ART adherence.
METHODS
The Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) is a multicenter cohort study. Women living with HIV complete interviewer-administered questionnaires semiannually. Cross-sectional analyses for the current article included 1168 women on ART for whom data on medication adherence were available from their last study visit between April 2013 and March 2014, when the internalized stigma measure was initially introduced.
RESULTS
The association between internalized stigma and self-reported suboptimal ART adherence was significant for those in racial/ethnic minority groups (AOR = 0.69, P = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.91), but not for non-Hispanic whites (AOR = 2.15, P = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.69 to 6.73). Depressive symptoms, loneliness, and low perceived social support mediated the association between internalized stigma and suboptimal adherence in the whole sample, as well as in the subsample of minority participants. In serial mediation models, internalized stigma predicted less-perceived social support (or higher loneliness), which in turn predicted more depressive symptoms, which in turn predicted suboptimal medication adherence.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings suggest that interconnected psychosocial mechanisms affect ART adherence, and that improvements in adherence may require multifaceted interventions addressing both mental health and interpersonal factors, especially for minority women.
View on PubMed2016
2016
2016
2016
2016
BACKGROUND & AIMS
We conducted a phase 4, open-label study with limited exclusion criteria to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ribavirin in veterans with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection, and compensated cirrhosis. This population is often excluded from clinical studies.
METHODS
We performed a prospective study of treatment-naive (n = 47) and treatment-experienced (n = 19) patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection and compensated cirrhosis at 15 Department of Veterans Affairs sites. All subjects were given sofosbuvir (400 mg, once daily) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) in divided doses for 12 weeks. Patients with major psychiatric diseases or alcohol or substance use disorders were not excluded. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy.
RESULTS
Fifty-two patients achieved a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (79%; 95% confidence interval, 67%-88%); 16 of these patients were treatment experienced (84%; 95% confidence interval, 60%-97%) and 36 were treatment naive (77%; 95% confidence interval, 62%-88%). All patients had at least 1 comorbidity. Thirty-five percent had depression, 24% had posttraumatic stress disorder, and 30% had anxiety disorder. In addition, 29% had current substance use. Of the 7 patients (11%) who discontinued the study treatment prematurely, 3 did so because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were fatigue, anemia, nausea, and headache. Serious adverse events occurred in 8 patients. Only 2 of the serious adverse events (anemia and nausea) were considered to be related to study treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
In a phase 4 study, 12 weeks treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin led to a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy in almost 80% of veterans with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection, compensated cirrhosis, and multiple comorbidities, regardless of their treatment history. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02128542.
View on PubMed2016
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Trajectories of eGFR in patients with CKD are highly variable. Only a subset of patients with CKD experiences a steady decline in eGFR. The objective of our study was to investigate whether eGFR trajectory patterns differ by APOL1 risk status.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS
Our study was a longitudinal observational study of 622 participants in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension with APOL1 genotyping and sufficient follow-up for estimating GFR trajectories. The predictor was APOL1 high-risk status (having two copies of the G1 or G2 risk alleles) versus low-risk status (zero or one copy of the risk alleles), and the outcome was four eGFR trajectory patterns on the basis of the joint probabilities of linearity and progression: steady decline, unsteady decline, steady stable, and unsteady stable.
RESULTS
Over a median follow-up of 9 years, 24.0% of participants experienced steady eGFR decline, 25.9% had an unsteady decline, 25.6% were steady and stable, and 24.6% were unsteady but stable. Those experiencing steady decline had lower eGFR and higher urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at baseline than participants with the other eGFR trajectory patterns. The APOL1 high-risk group was associated with a greater odds for the steady decline pattern than the APOL1 low-risk group (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.62 to 3.69). This association remained significant after adjusting for demographic factors, baseline eGFR, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, treatment assignment, and follow-up time (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.52).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with CKD attributed to hypertension, those with the APOL1 high-risk genotype were more likely to experience a steady decline trajectory in eGFR than those without the APOL1 high-risk genotype. These findings suggest a persistent underlying pathophysiologic process in those patients with the APOL1 high-risk genotype.
View on PubMed2016
BACKGROUND
Marijuana (hereafter "tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]") use has been associated with liver fibrosis progression in retrospective analyses of patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV). We studied long-term effects of THC on fibrosis progression in women coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV enrolled in the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS).
METHODS
Liver fibrosis was categorized according to FIB-4 scores as none, moderate, or significant. THC and alcohol use were quantified as average exposure per week. Associations between THC use and progression to significant fibrosis were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS
Among 575 HIV/HCV-coinfected women followed for a median of 11 (interquartile range, 6-17) years, 324 (56%) reported no THC use, 141 (25%) less than weekly use, 70 (12%) weekly use, and 40 (7%) daily use at WIHS entry. In univariable analysis, entry FIB-4 score (hazard ratio [HR], 2.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.88-2.73], P < .001), log HCV RNA (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.02-1.38], P = .02), tobacco use (HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.02-1.85], P = .04), CD4(+) count (risk per 100-cell increase: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, .86-.95], P < .001), and log HIV RNA (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05-1.32], P = .005) were associated with progression to significant fibrosis, as was cumulative alcohol use in follow-up (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.04], P < .001). In multivariable analysis, entry FIB-4, entry CD4(+) count, and cumulative alcohol use remained significant. Cumulative THC use was not associated with fibrosis progression (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, .92-1.10], P = .83).
CONCLUSIONS
In this large cohort of HIV/HCV-coinfected women, THC was not associated with progression to significant liver fibrosis. Alcohol use was independently associated with liver fibrosis, and may better predict fibrosis progression in HIV/HCV-coinfected women.
View on PubMed2016
BACKGROUND
Macrophage polarization programs, commonly referred to as "classical" and "alternative" activation, are widely considered as distinct states that are exclusive of one another and are associated with different functions such as inflammation and wound healing, respectively. In a number of disease contexts, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), macrophage polarization influences the extent of pathogenesis, and efforts are underway to eliminate pathogenic subsets. However, previous studies have not distinguished whether the simultaneous presence of both classical and alternative activation signatures represents the admixture of differentially polarized macrophages or if they have adopted a unique state characterized by components of both classical and alternative activation.
METHODS
We analyzed the gene expression profiles of individual monocyte-derived brain macrophages responding to TBI using single-cell RNA sequencing. RNA flow cytometry was used as another single-cell analysis technique to validate the single-cell RNA sequencing results.
RESULTS
The analysis of signature polarization genes by single-cell RNA sequencing revealed the presence of diverse activation states, including M(IL4), M(IL10), and M(LPS, IFNγ). However, the expression of a given polarization marker was no more likely than at random to predict simultaneous expression or repression of markers of another polarization program within the same cell, suggesting a lack of exclusivity in macrophage polarization states in vivo in TBI. Also unexpectedly, individual TBI macrophages simultaneously expressed high levels of signature polarization genes across two or three different polarization states and in several distinct and seemingly incompatible combinations.
CONCLUSIONS
Single-cell gene expression profiling demonstrated that monocytic macrophages in TBI are not comprised of distinctly polarized subsets but are uniquely and broadly activated. TBI macrophage activation in vivo is deeply complex, with individual cells concurrently adopting both inflammatory and reparative features with a lack of exclusivity. These data provide physiologically relevant evidence that the early macrophage response to TBI is comprised of novel activation states that are discordant with the current paradigm of macrophage polarization-a key consideration for therapeutic modulation.
View on PubMed